Posted by kemanuel
We all know about the ACA employer mandate. It placed a tremendous burden on employers, many of whom will only feel this burden weighing them down as we ring in the new year because, starting in 2016, companies with over 50 employees must offer health insurance to full time employees (those who work over 30 hours per week).
So how much does it cost you, as an employer, to hire an employee? Are there exceptions? Are there loopholes?
We will get to the first question in a second. The answer to the last two questions is a “yes,” which will be discussed further in this blog.
Cost of an employee
Employers have to pay Social Security tax, Medicare tax, state unemployment insurance, and, now in 2016, health care insurance benefits (if the company has 50+ employees).
Social Security tax is 6.2%. Medicare tax is 1.45%. State unemployment tax differs from state to state, but it can range from 0% to 12.27% (Massachusetts). For the sake of clarity, we will use 5%.
Health insurance benefits also can vary greatly depending on the plan. According to the Kaiser Family Foundation/Health Research & Education Trust 2015 Employer Health Benefits Survey, annual premiums for employer-sponsored family health coverage reached $17,545 this year, up 4 percent from last year, with workers on average paying $4,955 towards the cost of their coverage.
This means that the employer, on average, is paying $12,490 per year per employee for health care benefits.
Assuming a base salary of $70,000, an employer would spend:
Social Security tax: $4,340
Medicare tax: $1,015
State unemployment tax: $350
Health care insurance benefits: $12,490
For a whopping total of $18,195 per year.
Think about this…if you offer your employee a salary of $70,000/year, he/she has to produce revenue for that company of, at least, $88,195 per year in order for you to break even. As you well know, successful companies are not in the business of breaking even, so you will expect your employee to create, at least, over $90,000 of profit in order to be paid a salary of $70,000.
None of the above contemplate a 401K plan. If you’re in a position to offer your employees a 401K plan, they will need to be that much more profitable.
So how can you, as the employer of a home health company, a long term care facility, a dentist practice, or other health care provider decrease the amount of money spent on health care benefits?
“A Modest Proposal for the ACA Employer Mandate”
Before we begin our journey of “A Modest Proposal for the ACA Employer Mandate,” I would like to give a bit of an English lesson on satire, lest one of you miss it. Satire is defined as, “the use of humor, irony, exaggeration, or ridicule to expose and criticize people’s stupidity or vices, particularly in the context of contemporary politics and other topical issues.” It is burlesque. And so I write this blog in the vein of Jonathon Swift’s “A Modest Proposal” (for those of you who have not heard of it, I suggest you click on the link above). For the faint of heart, those easily offended, or those too lazy to click on the link, I suggest not reading further.
Below is my “A Modest Proposal for the ACA Employer Mandate.”
- Hire childless singles.
Childless singles are cheaper to insure. So screen your potential employees. Ask whether they intend to have children and warn them that you operate a non-child company. Explain that if you discover that any employee has a dependent child it will result in immediate termination. Bonuses for those who undergo voluntary hysterectomies or vasectomies.
2. Hire old people.
People over 65 are eligible for Medicare. They’re loyal; they don’t talk back. The only things they complain about are their ailments. Many expect little pay because they, or their parents, went through the Great Depression. You can be sure that they will not spend their time on Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, or other social media because they don’t know how. If the position involves driving, you can sure they will get no speeding tickets. Best of all, you know that you are not undertaking a long-term commitment.
3. Hire poor people.
People below the poverty line are eligible for Medicaid. They rarely talk on the phone to friends. Many even only talk to themselves, which is fantastic (and not creepy at all) in the workplace. They are never late with excuses of bad traffic; and their homes are, most likely, going to be very near by (and maybe right out front). They never try to “one-up” the Joneses’. You will never see them bragging about their new Iphones, Louis Vuitton bag, or Mercedes Benz.
5. Hire lazy people.
People who work under 30 hours per week do not get offered health care coverage. Hire employees who enjoy video games too excess. All the better if they own Assassin’s Creed: Victory, Battlefield: Hardline, and Dying Light. It’s an office party every day – no need to worry about them working over 30 hours per week – they like vodka, bourbon, and gin. It’s even better if they enjoy the occasional (daily) marijuana. Embrace a drug-friendly environment.
If you follow the above hiring tips, you too can avoid paying the ACA employer mandate. Remember, the key to success is to only hire childless singles, and old, poor, and lazy people.
And you’ve struck gold if you hire a childless, old, lazy, poor, single person….Goldmine!
Posted in Affordable Care Act, Eligibilty, Federal Government, Federal Law, Health Care Providers and Services, Home Health Care Agencies, Home Health Services, Knicole Emanuel, Legal Remedies for Medicaid Providers, Long Term Care Facilities, Medicaid, Medicaid Attorney, Medicaid Eligibility, Medicaid Services, Medicare, Medicare Attorney, Mental Health, NC, NC DHHS, North Carolina, Obamacare
Tags: A Modest Proposal, ACA, ACA Employer Mandate, Affordable Care Act, Cost of an employee, Cost of health care, Division of Medical Assistance, Employer Mandate, Health care, Health Care insurance benefits, Health care provider, Kaiser Family Foundation, Medicaid, Medicaid Eligibility, Medicaid recipients, Medicare, Medicare eligibility, Medicare Recipients, Medicare tax, NC DHHS, North Carolina, Social Security Tax, Unemployment tax