New Mexico Affords No Due Process Based on a PCG Audit!
I am finally back home in North Carolina from beautiful New Mexico. If you ever forget how large America is, fly across country for one day and come back. I think I ate 12 packets of Delta peanuts, and I know I spent over $8 for a hamburger at the Atlanta airport during a layover (How do they sleep at night charging that much for a hamburger?!). But…WOW!!…did I learn some eye-opening, Medicaid information.
It is without question that, recently, North Carolina providers that accept Medicaid have undergone serious, over-zealous scrutiny and audits. Even more so than normal. And, even more so, behavioral health care providers are undergoing increased scrutiny with the implementation of the Managed Care Organizations (MCOs).
But what I saw in New Mexico that has happened to 15 behavioral health care providers (BHP) in New Mexico, which served 87% of the NM Medicaid recipients, would make any American cringe.
Let me set the stage:
These BHP have been in business for a very long time without issue. OptumHealth (Optum) is one of the acting MCOs in New Mexico (NM). Analogous to our Alliance, EastPointe, or East Carolina Behavioral Health. From my understanding, sometime in January 2013, Optum contacted the NM single state entity that manages Medicaid. (In NC, the single state entity is the Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS), Division of Medical Assistance (DMA); in NM, it is Human Services Department (HSD)). Optum alleged that 15 BHP were committing abhorrent billing practices.
According to the representative for HSD, HSD decided to contract with Public Consulting Group (PCG) to conduct an independent audit to determine whether Optim’s allegations had merit. So, in Jan or Feb. 2013, HSD contracted with PCG to conduct the independent audit on the 15 BHP. The PCG Executive Summary of its audit was published in February 2013.
You can find the entire Executive Summary here.
PCG found, in pertinent part:
I know, hard to read. Anyway, PCG found over $36 million in overpayments to these 15 providers.
At first blush, one would think, “Holy cow! These providers were overpaid $36 million!” But hold on…how many providers here in NC have undergone a PCG audit, only to find that PCG’s audit was erroneous, the extrapolation was inflated, and many noncompliance claims were actually compliant?
Don’t know?
See NC Medicaid Extrapolation Audits: How Does $100 Become $100,000? Check for Clusters! Or Overinclusive NC Medicaid Recoupments and the Provider “Without Fault” Defense. Or NC Medicaid RACs Paid to Find Errors By Providers, No Incentive to Find Errors By DMA. Or The Exaggeration of the Tentative Notice of Overpayments.
The reality is that most PCG audits (at least the ones I have reviewed) are erroneous.
At the end of the day, the provider does NOT owe the over-inflated amount PCG claims. So, with the knowledge that many (all that I have seen) of PCG’s audits are erroneous, let me get back to my story.
Based on PCG’s audit, HSD determined that credible allegations of fraud existed and immediately suspended the Medicaid payments for all 15 providers.
But…get this…HSD provided zero appeal rights. The providers were unable to appeal the State’s decision to suspend the Medicaid payments. And even worse, PCG and the State refused to give the providers the data compiled by PCG that, supposedly, demonstrated the credible allegations of fraud. So the providers could not even defend themselves against the audit results because the providers were not allowed to see the audit results. To this day, the providers do not know what documents PCG audited or what the purported noncompliance is.
This would be similar to me accusing you of embezzling money from my company, but never showing you what proof I have. Firing you for embezzlement and calling the police. The police arresting you based on my accusation, but you never get a day in court or even the proof to defend yourself.
In America, really? Where is the due process?
The Fourteenth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution states, in pertinent part:
All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.
I mean, come on, due process is a benchmark of our country. As American as cheeseburgers and the 4th of July…
Yet, these 15 providers in New Mexico received no due process.
During the Tuesday, September 3, 2013, New Mexico behavioral health subcommittee, Larry Heyek, the HSD Deputy General Counsel, cited the authority for HSD’s preliminary investigation as 42 C.F.R. 455.14, which states that:
“If the agency receives a complaint of Medicaid fraud or abuse from any source or identifies any questionable practices, it must conduct a preliminary investigation to determine whether there is sufficient basis to warrant a full investigation.”
Interestingly enough, the C.F.R. section preceding 455.14 requires due process.
42 CFR 455.13 states:
The Medicaid agency must have—
(a) Methods and criteria for identifying suspected fraud cases;
(b) Methods for investigating these cases that—
(1) Do not infringe on the legal rights of persons involved; and
(2) Afford due process of law; and
(c) Procedures, developed in cooperation with State legal authorities, for referring suspected fraud cases to law enforcement officials.
(emphasis added).
Yet, the State of New Mexico, based on PCG’s audit, infringed on the legal rights of all 15 providers and no provider was afforded due process of law.
So what happened to these 15 providers due to the PCG audit? Did HSD attempt a recoupment of the $36 million? Did HSD terminate the 15 providers’ Medicaid contract? A plan of correction?
No.
HSD went to Arizona, hired 3-5 (not sure on the number) large, health care providers to take over the 15 providers’ companies. Literally, these Arizona companies have gone to the 15 providers’ buildings and have either purchased the buildings or leased the buildings and the 15 providers no longer exist (realistically…legally, the companies still exist). Staff was fired. Medicaid recipients were not serviced.
Talk about a hostile takeover!!!
But, here is the kicker….
HSD, supposedly, hired PCG to conduct an independent audit on the 15 providers. Yet, Thomas Aldrich, a manager at PCG, testified at the NM subcommittee’s meeting that Mr. Aldrich (PRIOR to conducting the “independent” audit) flew with Secretary Sidonie Squier, and others, to Arizona to vet health care providers to take over the 15 NM providers.
PRIOR to the audit!!!!
Secretary Squier did not know whether Optum’s allegations of abhorrent billing practices had merit. Yet, she and Mr. Aldrich flew to Arizona, on NM Medicaid dollars, and sought out Arizona companies that could take over the 15 NM providers. BEFORE any proof of truly abhorrent billing.
BEFORE the providers could defend themselves.
Imagine the State of North Carolina coming and taking over your company. Imagine you have no due process. Imagine you don’t even understand the charges with which the State is charging you.
Now imagine that the scenario is reality…in New Mexico.
Oh, BTW, Thomas Aldrich, the manager at PCG, testified in front of the NM behavioral health committee that he is in charge of two major projects: (1) the New Mexico audit; and (2) the North Carolina audits.
Providers, beware!
Posted on September 5, 2013, in "Single State Agency", Accountability, Behavioral health, Division of Medical Assistance, Due process, Extrapolations, Fraud, Harassment, Health Care Providers and Services, Lawsuit, Legal Analysis, Legal Remedies for Medicaid Providers, MCO, Media, Medicaid, Medicaid Audits, Medicaid Contracts, Medicaid Fraud, Medicaid Recipients, Medicaid Reimbursement, Medicaid Reimbursements, Mental Health, Mental Health Problems, Mental Illness, NC DHHS, New Mexico, North Carolina, Post-Payment Reviews, Provider Medicaid Contracts, Public Consulting Group, Regulatory Audits, Suspension of Medicaid Payments, Tentative Notices of Overpayment, Termination of Medicaid Contract and tagged Audit, Behavioral health, Division of Medical Assistance, DMA, Due process, Health care, Health care provider, Managed Care Organizations, MCO, Medicaid, Medicaid Audits, Mental health, NC DHHS, New Mexico, North Carolina, PCG, Public Consulting Group, Secretary Squire, Tentative Notice of Overpayment. Bookmark the permalink. 21 Comments.
This summarizes how I feel in the current climate of the current Mental Health field…helpless! Unfortunately, I would not be surprised if something like this happens in NC…actually it seems probable!
This is rather frightening.
Thank you for the summary. I live in NM and worked for many years at one of the bx health clinics that witnessed the hostile takeover. It is FRIGHTENING how this occurred and the way in which it went down. These are solid, reputable agencies that have deep roots with the NM public. One thing you didn’t include is that these “acting” CEOs and staff are making anywhere between $200 and $300 dollars AN HOUR. Nancy Jo Archer, the CEO of Hogares (on public record) made $113,00 a year. This averages out to a little under $60 an hour (if she only worked 40 hours a week and didn’t take any time off.) The new CEO of Hogares (now Open Skies) will earn nearly $50,000 A MONTH. Talk about waste of Medicaid dollars and taxes. Such a sad situation
http://www.savebehavioralhealthnm.com
Eight New Mexico providers sued in federal court and attempted to obtain a TRO. They argued lack of due process. You should read the court opinion and educate yourself as the court denied the request. The providers then appealed to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit again asking for injunctive relief. The 10th Circuit dismissed the appeal.
Larry,
Nice to see you again. I have looked into the injunction sought. I mentioned my thoughts as to the injunction sought during my testimony before the New Mexico subcommittee.
Two New Mexico behavioral health providers agree to repay $4.2 million
http://www.nmtelegram.com/2013/11/04/two-behavioral-health-providers-agree-to-repay-4-2-million/
Pingback: Lawsuit Against PCG: Allegations That PCG is Inept and Malicious! | medicaidlaw-nc
Pingback: Wanted: North Carolina Medicaid Director: Transparent and Open! | medicaidlaw-nc
Pingback: Traveling to New Mexico: Another Administrative Action with PCG | medicaidlaw-nc
Pingback: New Mexico Senator Proposes Forefront State Legislation to Provide Due Process to Providers Accused of Fraud (Oh, And Here Are Some NC Election Results) | medicaidlaw-nc
Pingback: New Mexico Senator Proposes Forefront State Legislation to Provide Due Process to Providers Accused of Fraud (Oh, And Here Are Some NC Election Results) (JDSUPRA) | New Mexico Senate Democrats
Pingback: Williams Mullen and Local Counsel, Bryan Davis, Win Declaratory Action Against HSD in New Mexico!! | medicaidlaw-nc
Pingback: Have an Inkling of a Possible Overpayment, You Must Repay Within 60 Days, Says U.S. District Court! | medicaidlaw-nc
Pingback: Accusations of Medicaid/care Fraud Run Rampant in SC: There Are Legal Remedies! | medicaidlaw-nc
Pingback: Another Win for Gordon & Rees! Judge Finds NM HSD Arbitrary, Capricious, and Not Otherwise in Accordance of Law! And JUSTICE PREVAILS! | medicaidlaw-nc
Pingback: Governmental Wand Waving and Late Apologies | medicaidlaw-nc
Pingback: Another Win for the Good Guys! Federal Preliminary Injunction Granted!! | medicaidlaw-nc
Pingback: Former mental health providers take fight over Medicaid funds to lawmakers | medicaidlaw-nc
Pingback: Medicaid/care Fraud: You Are Guilty Until Proven Innocent! | medicaidlaw-nc
Pingback: Health Care Fraud Liability: With Yates Fired – What Happens to the Memo? | medicaidlaw-nc